Back to all facts
Recurring talking point

Section 7 consent agreements under DRIPA hand Indigenous governing bodies veto-like pre-approval power over Crown land decisions.

Scott McInnis, BC Conservative Caucus
MLA, Columbia River–Revelstoke; BC Conservative Critic for Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation · Feb 2026

Fact-checked — verified

Section 7 of DRIPA sets three guardrails for every agreement: (1) it must be authorized by the Lieutenant Governor in Council — that is, Cabinet — before it is signed; (2) it is limited to specified statutory powers of decision, not a general transfer of authority; and (3) it must be published in the BC Gazette to take effect. As of late 2025, only four such agreements exist: the Tahltan Central Government on Eskay Creek (2022), Red Chris (2023), Galore Creek (2023 negotiation mandate), and 'Namgis on North Island forestry (approved October 2025). They are voluntary, project-specific, and negotiated. None transfers general statutory power. The BC government publishes the full registry at 'Making Decisions Together.'

Full source details

Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (Bill 41 — 2019)

Province of British Columbia · 2019-11-28[S.B.C. 2019, c. 44]

Making Decisions Together — registry of Section 7 consent-based and joint decision-making agreements under DRIPA

Province of British Columbia, Ministry of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation · 2025-10-31

Eskay Creek consent-based decision-making agreement (Tahltan Central Government)

Province of British Columbia & Tahltan Central Government · 2022-06-06

Red Chris mine Section 7 agreement

Province of British Columbia & Tahltan Central Government · 2023-11-15

Share this fact-check

dripafacts.ca/en/myth/section-7-joint-power/