← Back to all facts
Claim — unverified

The Gitxaała ruling and the Cowichan ruling are the same thing — both caused by DRIPA.

David Eby / multiple politicians, Various media
Premier of BC / various · Mar 2026

Fact-checked — verified

These are completely different cases. The Cowichan case was filed in 2014 — five years before DRIPA — and rests on Section 35 constitutional Aboriginal title rights. The Gitxaała case is about whether DRIPA's interpretive provisions (Section 8.1 of the Interpretation Act, added in 2021) give UNDRIP 'immediate legal effect.' Former Green MLA Adam Olsen accused Premier Eby of 'seemingly intentionally winding the Cowichan and Gitxaała decisions into the same ball and saying it's all one big problem.' Conflating them is the most damaging piece of the misinformation campaign.

Full source details

Gitxaała v. British Columbia (Chief Gold Commissioner)

British Columbia Court of Appeal · 2025-12-05[2025 BCCA 430]

Cowichan Tribes v. Canada (Attorney General)

Supreme Court of British Columbia · Justice Barbara Young · 2025-08-07

Share this fact-check

dripafacts.ca/en/myth/gitxaala-cowichan-same/